Connect with us

Top News

Explained: The new Indian road to Lipu Lekh, Nepal’s protests, and the area’s strategic importance

Published

on

Opening up of Lipulekh pass for Kailash Mansarovar has led Nepal lodge protest with India claiming Kalapani area in Pithoragarh district of Uttarakhand as its own territory. The new route passes through Kalapani.

It is the second big Indo-Nepal border controversy since 1997, when Nepal first objected to Kalapani area being under Indian governance. Kalapani is a strategically important tri-junction between India, China and Nepal in the Pithoragarh district of Uttarahand.

In 1997, Nepal raised objections after India and China agreed to open the Lipulekh pass to facilitate a travel route to Mansarovar. Nepal says Kalapani is part of its Darchula district in Sudur Paschim Pradesh. Kalapani is largely a valley formed by a mess of Himalayan rivers, contributing to what is known as Kali, Mahakali or Sharda river at various points in Nepal and India.

Lipulekh sits atop the Kalapani Valley and forms a tri-junction between India, Nepal and China. It is an ancient trade and pilgrimage route made famous locally by the Bhutiya people who have inhabited the region for centuries.

India closed this route in the aftermath of the Chinese aggression in 1962. But earlier this month, India reopened the Lipulekh pass for Kailash Mansarovar following construction of a new 22 km road. It opens from a village called Gunji. Nepal claims the village and the road to be its territory.

There is a little history to this territorial dispute.

In the 1700’s Nepal had an ambitious king named Prithvi Narayan Shah, credited for solidification and unification of Nepal. He expanded his territories to the west in Uttarakhand. On the Indian side, Britain was the master. The two armies clashed in a war that ended with the Treaty of Sugauli in 1816. Among other things, it demarcated Kumaon in Uttarkhand from Nepal with River Kali serving as the boundary line between India and Nepal.Here lies the dispute.

Like many rivers of Himalayan origin, River Kali has been shifting its course, not as prominently as River Koshi but still significantly.
Secondly, to demarcate River Kali as the boundary, there should be an agreement on the origin of the river. India, and earlier Britain, considers its origin in the source of northeastern — Kalapani – streams, while Nepal says the river originates in the southwestern — Kuthi Yankti — streams.

A much-cited Almora Gazetteer of 1911 favours the northeastern origin. This is in sync with the British decision taken upon a representation made by Nepal in 1817. The Nepalese king sent a missive that areas in the southwest of Lipulekh belonged to him for being the source of the river.

The British surveyors didn’t agree on the basis of geography and local nomenclature of River Kali, which got its name much before the meeting point of the two sets of streams.

Then there is a third aspect. River Kali bisects an area called Byans. People of the area are still called Byansis. Byans was a paragana under the Mughals. (Paragana was like a district unit.)

In the southeastern part of the Byans is situated the Gunji village which is now the gateway for Mansarovar.

After the Teaty of Sugauli, the British transferred Byans areas east of River Kali to Nepal, which sent further representations staking claim on Kuthi Yankti areas. The British in 1860’s shifted their military base to Kalapani, closer to the source of the River Kali. This arrangemen continued till 1947, when the original Brexit happened on Indian subcontinent.
India and Nepal signed a friendship treaty in 1950 to formalize ancient ties in post-colonial era. Nepal was more aligned towards India for decades after the 1947 Brexit. And, the Chinese occupation of Tibet in 1950-51 left it to India to secure the combined India-Nepal border in the region.
In 1954, India and China signed a trade treaty, agreeing Lipulekh pass as the Indian gateway.
In 1961, Nepal and China signed a treaty recognizing Tinkar pass as the Nepalese point of entry. Nepal-China border Pillar Number-1 still stands there.
In 1962, India shut the Lipulekh pass fearing more Chinese incursions. Nepal is not not known to have objected to its closure.
Equation started changing during the 1990’s as China started growing in stature. India and China moved to deepen trade engagement which pushed towards opening up of the Lipulekh pass. China also tried to have some foothold in Nepal.

This was the time when China developed more interest and geo-strategic investment in Nepal. It was also the time when China-leaning Maoist leaders grew in stature in Nepal. Kalapani became a sticking point between India and Nepal thereafter.

India and Nepal signed the Mahakali agreement in 1996 for sharing of the river water. The two countries also signed another agreement in 1998 when they resorted to settling all boundary disputes, including the Kalapani dispute, through bilateral talks.
In 2015, when India and China (under the influence Narendra Modi-Xi Jinping chemistry) signed another trade treaty allowing trade through Lipulekh pass, Nepal lodged protest with both India and China staking claim on the Kalapani area.

Nepal says it has historical documents and tax receipts to show that people inhabiting that area belonged to the country. India, on the other hand, rejects the claim citing Mughal history and British control over the area. After the British left India, it maintained a police post in Kalapani since mid-1950’s. From 1979-80, the Indo-Tibetan Border Police (ITBP) has been manning the boundaries.

Kalapani being another tri-junction involving India and China, it is a strategic vantage point for the country that controls the area. China is making serious inroads in Nepal, through investment in both infrastructure and technology.

Many including Indian Army chief General MM Narawane see a not-so-invisible Chinese hand behind recent Nepal’s assertion on Kalapani and sending of its border police team to the area.

However, ignoring the history of Kalapani would be misleading.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Casino Days Reveal Internal Data on Most Popular Smartphones

Published

on

By

CasinoDays India

International online casino Casino Days has published a report sharing their internal data on what types and brands of devices are used to play on the platform by users from the South Asian region.

Such aggregate data analyses allow the operator to optimise their website for the brands and models of devices people are actually using.

The insights gained through the research also help Casino Days tailor their services based on the better understanding of their clients and their needs.

Desktops and Tablets Lose the Battle vs Mobile

The primary data samples analysed by Casino Days reveal that mobile connections dominate the market in South Asia and are responsible for a whopping 96.6% of gaming sessions, while computers and tablets have negligible shares of 2.9% and 0.5% respectively.

CasinoDays India

The authors of the study point out that historically, playing online casino was exclusively done on computers, and attribute thе major shift to mobile that has unfolded over time to the wide spread of cheaper smartphones and mobile data plans in South Asia.

“Some of the reasons behind this massive difference in device type are affordability, technical advantages, as well as cheaper and more obtainable internet plans for mobiles than those for computers,” the researchers comment.

Xiaomi and Vivo Outperform Samsung, Apple Way Down in Rankings

Chinese brands Xiaomi and Vivo were used by 21.9% and 20.79% of Casino Days players from South Asia respectively, and together with the positioned in third place with a 18.1% share South Korean brand Samsung dominate the market among real money gamers in the region.

 

CasinoDays India

Cupertino, California-based Apple is way down in seventh with a user share of just 2.29%, overshadowed by Chinese brands Realme (11.43%), OPPO (11.23%), and OnePlus (4.07%).

Huawei is at the very bottom of the chart with a tiny share just below the single percent mark, trailing behind mobile devices by Motorola, Google, and Infinix.

The data on actual phone usage provided by Casino Days, even though limited to the gaming parts of the population of South Asia, paints a different picture from global statistics on smartphone shipments by vendors.

Apple and Samsung have been sharing the worldwide lead for over a decade, while current regional leader Xiaomi secured their third position globally just a couple of years ago.

Striking Android Dominance among South Asian Real Money Gaming Communities

The shifted market share patterns of the world’s top smartphone brands in South Asia observed by the Casino Days research paper reveal a striking dominance of Android devices at the expense of iOS-powered phones.

On the global level, Android enjoys a comfortable lead with a sizable 68.79% share which grows to nearly 79% when we look at the whole continent of Asia. The data on South Asian real money gaming communities suggests that Android’s dominance grows even higher and is north of the 90% mark.

Among the major factors behind these figures, the authors of the study point to the relative affordability of and greater availability of Android devices in the region, especially when manufactured locally in countries like India and Vietnam.

“And, with influencers and tech reviews putting emphasis on Android devices, the choice of mobile phone brand and OS becomes easy; Android has a much wider range of products and caters to the Asian online casino market in ways that Apple can’t due to technical limitations,” the researchers add.

The far better integration achieved by Google Pay compared to its counterpart Apple Pay has also played a crucial role in shaping the existing smartphone market trends.

 

Content provided by Adverloom

Continue Reading

Trending