Connect with us

IANS News

ASI lifts ban on photography at protected monuments

Published

on

New Delhi, July 12 (IANS) Hours after Prime Minister Narendra Modi questioned the rule prohibiting photography at protected monuments, the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) on Thursday lifted the ban on photography within the premises of all centrally protected monuments/sites, except at three sites.

The three monuments/sites in which the photography would not be permitted are Ajanta Caves, Leh Palace and the Taj Mahal at Agra.

Earlier in the day, Modi while inaugurating Dharohar Bhawan, the new headquarters building of the ASI, had questioned rules that prohibit people from taking pictures at some monuments as he called for people’s participation and involvement in protecting the country’s archeological heritage.

Modi referred to notices at some monuments asking people not to take pictures and said the times had changed and it was possible through technology to zero in on a neighbourhood.

“Using space technology, you can know what is the number of a scooter parked in an area of Delhi. But on the board of monument it is written that photography is prohibited. Time has changed, technology has changed.”

Recalling his experience as Gujarat Chief Minister, Modi said that he gave instructions to withdraw the notice that prevented people from taking pictures at Sardar Sarovar dam.

He said there was good response and later ticketing was introduced.

–IANS
mak/ahm/vd

Continue Reading

IANS News

Government, not us, denigrating rules: Opposition

Published

on

New Delhi, July 17 (IANS) The opposition on Tuesday said that it has been very “decent and dignified” in its conduct while it is the ruling BJP which is “denigrating the rules and the Constitution” and lowering the dignity of Parliament.

In a letter to Lok Sabha Speaker Sumitra Mahajan that was signed by around half a dozen leaders from different political parties, the opposition said that the government was having both its say and way in all matters while the opposition had been relegated to the margins.

It also underlined how the Chair repeatedly denied the opposition an opportunity to grill the government through no-confidence motion.

“Unfortunately, the government could not only bulldoze the house to get the Budget 2018-19 passed amid a din without any debate and discussion, but also sneak in most retrogressive and anti-democratic measures by way of introducing inadmissible amendments to the Finance Bill and pushing them through without the world knowing what was happening in the temple of the world’s largest democracy,” the letter said.

“To do this, the government moved motions to suspend the rules meant to prevent surreptitious legislation. With deep sense of anguish, we have to state the fact that without the Chair admitting, such motions to move for suspension of rules would not have come before the house, in the first place.”

The opposition also expressed concern at what it called a “new trend” that would prove to be “lethal” to the constitutional democracy of India if not checked, that is, the Chair not admitting the no-confidence motion.

“As you are fully aware, madam Speaker, the concept of ‘no confidence’ flow from Article 75 (3) of the Constitution, which says the Council of Ministers shall be collectively responsible to the House of the people. That is the reason why the Rule 198 of Lok Sabha Rules doesn’t vest any discretionary powers in the Speaker as far as admissibility of the no-confidence motion is concerned,” the letter said.

It said that once 50 members stand in favour of the motion, the Speaker has to annouce that the House has granted leave (permission) for no confidence motion to be taken up.

“Yet, we were all witness to the disastrous manner in which the notices given by various parties were dealt with, including one given by a party which was till recently a trusted ally of the ruling party.

“For all your concerns for the image of our Parliament globally, this ignominious chapter in the history of Indian Parliament has no precedent world over,” it said.

“With deep sense of regret, we must place on record, the anguish we felt when media editorially commented not so charitably on the role of the Chair in this entire episode. Any aspersion cast on the Chair reflects poorly on the members of that House as well,” it added.

The letter was signed by Mallikarjun Kharge (Congress), Mohammed Salim (CPI-M), Jyotiraditya Scindia (Congress), Dharmendra Yadav (SP), Tariq Anwar (NCP), Jay Prakash Narayan Yadav (RJD), Bhagwat Mann (AAP), C.N. Jayadevan (CPI) and P.K. Kunhalikutty (IUML).

–IANS
sid-mak/tsb/sed

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2018 Aaj Ki Khabar.